Fun Facts About the Name Bruce
- An all-time favorite: U.S. records show 386,871 boys named Bruce from 1880 through 2025.
- An established favorite: Bruce held a place in the U.S. top 100 for 39 consecutive years, from 1932 through 1970.
- More than 388 thousand babies named Bruce: U.S. records list 388,266 babies given the name Bruce from 1880 through 2025. Even 1,395 girls received the name Bruce - about 1 girl for every 277 boys.
What Does the Name Bruce Mean?
Bruce is a masculine given name and a Scottish surname. It comes from the Norman French surname de Brus or de Bruis, meaning 'of Brix' - a reference to Brix, a place in Normandy, now in the Manche department of France. As a habitational surname, it identified a family by its place of origin. The ultimate sense of the place name Brix is uncertain: one explanation derives it from a Gaulish word for a hill or fortified height, while another connects it with a personal name. The name passed into Scots and English as Bruce, and the given name was later taken from the surname.
Bruce Name History & Origins
The surname reached Britain and Scotland through the Norman family of de Brus. Robert de Brus, a Norman knight, received lands in Yorkshire after the Norman Conquest, and he was later granted the lordship of Annandale in Scotland by King David I. In Scottish usage the surname became Bruce; the Gaelic form of the family name is Brus. The family's most famous member was Robert de Brus, Earl of Carrick, who became King Robert I of Scots in 1306 and defeated the English at Bannockburn in 1314. He is commonly called Robert the Bruce, but Bruce was his surname, not a given name.
Bruce began to be used as a masculine first name in Scotland, where surnames were sometimes adopted as given names. It is recorded in Scotland by the 19th century and later appears in other English-speaking countries. In modern fiction, Bruce Wayne, introduced in 1939 as the secret identity of Batman, is a well-known literary use of the name; this is separate from its medieval origin and does not explain the name's earlier history.
How Popular is the Name Bruce?
Bruce remained among the top 100 boy names in the U.S. from 1932 to 1970. Its highest annual birth count was in 1956, and people born that year turn 70 in 2026.
U.S. name popularity from 1880-2025, based on SSA data. Rank shows how the name compares with other names - lower numbers mean greater popularity. Births shows how many babies received the name each year.
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | #13,736 | 5 | 0.0003% |
| 1991 | #11,704 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1988 | #10,542 | 6 | 0.0003% |
| 1987 | #8,091 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1986 | #7,846 | 8 | 0.0005% |
| 1985 | #4,653 | 16 | 0.0009% |
| 1984 | #6,360 | 10 | 0.0006% |
| 1983 | #5,865 | 11 | 0.0007% |
| 1982 | #6,953 | 9 | 0.0005% |
| 1981 | #8,225 | 7 | 0.0004% |
| 1980 | #4,347 | 17 | 0.0010% |
| 1979 | #5,459 | 12 | 0.0007% |
| 1978 | #4,962 | 13 | 0.0008% |
| 1977 | #4,967 | 13 | 0.0008% |
| 1976 | #3,828 | 17 | 0.0012% |
| 1975 | #6,021 | 9 | 0.0006% |
| 1974 | #4,248 | 14 | 0.0010% |
| 1973 | #3,993 | 15 | 0.0010% |
| 1972 | #3,913 | 15 | 0.0010% |
| 1971 | #3,073 | 22 | 0.0013% |
| 1970 | #3,733 | 16 | 0.0009% |
| 1969 | #3,211 | 18 | 0.0011% |
| 1968 | #2,302 | 28 | 0.0017% |
| 1967 | #2,879 | 19 | 0.0012% |
| 1966 | #2,063 | 32 | 0.0019% |
| 1965 | #2,302 | 27 | 0.0015% |
| 1964 | #1,920 | 38 | 0.0020% |
| 1963 | #2,064 | 33 | 0.0017% |
| 1962 | #2,120 | 31 | 0.0016% |
| 1961 | #2,156 | 30 | 0.0015% |
| 1960 | #1,983 | 33 | 0.0016% |
| 1959 | #1,824 | 37 | 0.0018% |
| 1958 | #1,822 | 36 | 0.0018% |
| 1957 | #1,957 | 31 | 0.0015% |
| 1956 | #1,872 | 33 | 0.0016% |
| 1955 | #1,844 | 33 | 0.0017% |
| 1954 | #1,743 | 35 | 0.0018% |
| 1953 | #1,787 | 31 | 0.0016% |
| 1952 | #1,785 | 31 | 0.0017% |
| 1951 | #1,613 | 35 | 0.0019% |
| 1950 | #1,838 | 27 | 0.0016% |
| 1949 | #1,633 | 33 | 0.0019% |
| 1948 | #1,905 | 25 | 0.0015% |
| 1947 | #1,953 | 25 | 0.0014% |
| 1946 | #2,238 | 18 | 0.0011% |
| 1945 | #2,348 | 14 | 0.0011% |
| 1944 | #2,104 | 17 | 0.0013% |
| 1943 | #1,955 | 20 | 0.0014% |
| 1942 | #2,125 | 17 | 0.0013% |
| 1941 | #2,416 | 13 | 0.0011% |
| 1940 | #2,043 | 16 | 0.0014% |
| 1939 | #3,472 | 7 | 0.0006% |
| 1938 | #2,031 | 16 | 0.0015% |
| 1937 | #2,208 | 14 | 0.0013% |
| 1936 | #2,886 | 9 | 0.0009% |
| 1935 | #3,184 | 8 | 0.0008% |
| 1934 | #2,302 | 13 | 0.0012% |
| 1933 | #2,561 | 11 | 0.0011% |
| 1932 | #2,514 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1931 | #3,005 | 9 | 0.0008% |
| 1930 | #2,211 | 15 | 0.0013% |
| 1929 | #2,600 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1928 | #1,908 | 20 | 0.0017% |
| 1927 | #2,570 | 13 | 0.0011% |
| 1926 | #3,074 | 10 | 0.0008% |
| 1925 | #4,084 | 7 | 0.0006% |
| 1924 | #2,994 | 11 | 0.0009% |
| 1923 | #2,603 | 13 | 0.0011% |
| 1922 | #2,987 | 11 | 0.0009% |
| 1921 | #2,649 | 13 | 0.0011% |
| 1920 | #2,021 | 19 | 0.0016% |
| 1919 | #2,664 | 12 | 0.0011% |
| 1918 | #2,699 | 12 | 0.0010% |
| 1917 | #4,161 | 6 | 0.0006% |
| 1916 | #2,041 | 16 | 0.0015% |
| 1915 | #3,479 | 7 | 0.0007% |
| 1914 | #2,930 | 7 | 0.0009% |
| 1913 | #2,873 | 6 | 0.0010% |
| 1911 | #2,515 | 5 | 0.0012% |
| 1908 | #2,155 | 5 | 0.0015% |
| 1896 | #1,435 | 6 | 0.0025% |
| 1895 | #1,624 | 5 | 0.0021% |
| Year | Rank | Births | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | #536 | 558 | 0.0327% |
| 2024 | #537 | 553 | 0.0322% |
| 2023 | #541 | 547 | 0.0320% |
| 2022 | #563 | 526 | 0.0302% |
| 2021 | #536 | 548 | 0.0313% |
| 2020 | #498 | 587 | 0.0340% |
| 2019 | #471 | 624 | 0.0348% |
| 2018 | #475 | 612 | 0.0337% |
| 2017 | #429 | 721 | 0.0390% |
| 2016 | #440 | 702 | 0.0370% |
| 2015 | #404 | 765 | 0.0399% |
| 2014 | #401 | 773 | 0.0403% |
| 2013 | #416 | 710 | 0.0375% |
| 2012 | #422 | 668 | 0.0352% |
| 2011 | #469 | 574 | 0.0302% |
| 2010 | #533 | 485 | 0.0253% |
| 2009 | #466 | 586 | 0.0295% |
| 2008 | #478 | 581 | 0.0285% |
| 2007 | #439 | 636 | 0.0306% |
| 2006 | #481 | 550 | 0.0268% |
| 2005 | #504 | 490 | 0.0245% |
| 2004 | #474 | 532 | 0.0268% |
| 2003 | #486 | 509 | 0.0258% |
| 2002 | #467 | 510 | 0.0263% |
| 2001 | #424 | 579 | 0.0298% |
| 2000 | #432 | 563 | 0.0287% |
| 1999 | #407 | 589 | 0.0307% |
| 1998 | #383 | 652 | 0.0341% |
| 1997 | #383 | 631 | 0.0335% |
| 1996 | #364 | 663 | 0.0350% |
| 1995 | #362 | 665 | 0.0349% |
| 1994 | #331 | 747 | 0.0387% |
| 1993 | #321 | 822 | 0.0419% |
| 1992 | #291 | 922 | 0.0462% |
| 1991 | #261 | 1,039 | 0.0514% |
| 1990 | #239 | 1,170 | 0.0570% |
| 1989 | #222 | 1,212 | 0.0606% |
| 1988 | #205 | 1,286 | 0.0672% |
| 1987 | #199 | 1,304 | 0.0698% |
| 1986 | #189 | 1,348 | 0.0732% |
| 1985 | #183 | 1,412 | 0.0764% |
| 1984 | #175 | 1,460 | 0.0809% |
| 1983 | #178 | 1,440 | 0.0803% |
| 1982 | #169 | 1,589 | 0.0876% |
| 1981 | #164 | 1,634 | 0.0912% |
| 1980 | #157 | 1,650 | 0.0925% |
| 1979 | #152 | 1,712 | 0.0994% |
| 1978 | #151 | 1,701 | 0.1036% |
| 1977 | #148 | 1,700 | 0.1034% |
| 1976 | #148 | 1,690 | 0.1077% |
| 1975 | #140 | 1,789 | 0.1146% |
| 1974 | #136 | 1,854 | 0.1179% |
| 1973 | #134 | 1,914 | 0.1228% |
| 1972 | #121 | 2,313 | 0.1426% |
| 1971 | #109 | 2,972 | 0.1681% |
| 1970 | #94 | 3,482 | 0.1874% |
| 1969 | #72 | 4,043 | 0.2261% |
| 1968 | #61 | 4,486 | 0.2581% |
| 1967 | #55 | 5,066 | 0.2905% |
| 1966 | #53 | 5,843 | 0.3276% |
| 1965 | #50 | 6,325 | 0.3400% |
| 1964 | #46 | 7,893 | 0.3961% |
| 1963 | #43 | 9,273 | 0.4566% |
| 1962 | #41 | 10,038 | 0.4852% |
| 1961 | #40 | 10,704 | 0.5040% |
| 1960 | #39 | 10,966 | 0.5144% |
| 1959 | #38 | 11,912 | 0.5581% |
| 1958 | #36 | 12,475 | 0.5878% |
| 1957 | #34 | 13,882 | 0.6435% |
| 1956 | #33 | 14,660 | 0.6930% |
| 1955 | #32 | 14,083 | 0.6837% |
| 1954 | #30 | 14,155 | 0.6943% |
| 1953 | #28 | 14,048 | 0.7123% |
| 1952 | #25 | 14,480 | 0.7450% |
| 1951 | #26 | 14,090 | 0.7483% |
| 1950 | #26 | 12,674 | 0.7079% |
| 1949 | #26 | 12,265 | 0.6914% |
| 1948 | #28 | 11,065 | 0.6306% |
| 1947 | #29 | 10,524 | 0.5752% |
| 1946 | #32 | 8,459 | 0.5209% |
| 1945 | #48 | 5,615 | 0.4172% |
| 1944 | #51 | 5,262 | 0.3861% |
| 1943 | #51 | 5,430 | 0.3804% |
| 1942 | #50 | 5,385 | 0.3899% |
| 1941 | #51 | 4,302 | 0.3502% |
| 1940 | #55 | 3,789 | 0.3269% |
| 1939 | #64 | 3,233 | 0.2921% |
| 1938 | #66 | 3,127 | 0.2819% |
| 1937 | #70 | 2,809 | 0.2634% |
| 1936 | #73 | 2,630 | 0.2536% |
| 1935 | #77 | 2,447 | 0.2350% |
| 1934 | #78 | 2,401 | 0.2325% |
| 1933 | #91 | 2,037 | 0.2054% |
| 1932 | #98 | 1,935 | 0.1853% |
| 1931 | #101 | 1,787 | 0.1719% |
| 1930 | #109 | 1,713 | 0.1561% |
| 1929 | #112 | 1,618 | 0.1504% |
| 1928 | #112 | 1,628 | 0.1470% |
| 1927 | #124 | 1,459 | 0.1295% |
| 1926 | #127 | 1,413 | 0.1272% |
| 1925 | #130 | 1,354 | 0.1213% |
| 1924 | #133 | 1,311 | 0.1157% |
| 1923 | #135 | 1,224 | 0.1117% |
| 1922 | #142 | 1,106 | 0.1016% |
| 1921 | #146 | 1,070 | 0.0971% |
| 1920 | #149 | 996 | 0.0936% |
| 1919 | #151 | 880 | 0.0898% |
| 1918 | #146 | 988 | 0.0975% |
| 1917 | #156 | 805 | 0.0870% |
| 1916 | #162 | 740 | 0.0831% |
| 1915 | #172 | 663 | 0.0781% |
| 1914 | #169 | 530 | 0.0809% |
| 1913 | #175 | 390 | 0.0761% |
| 1912 | #178 | 328 | 0.0763% |
| 1911 | #197 | 155 | 0.0686% |
| 1910 | #239 | 98 | 0.0505% |
| 1909 | #185 | 121 | 0.0738% |
| 1908 | #205 | 99 | 0.0641% |
| 1907 | #213 | 89 | 0.0606% |
| 1906 | #224 | 77 | 0.0578% |
| 1905 | #205 | 85 | 0.0642% |
| 1904 | #198 | 87 | 0.0679% |
| 1903 | #220 | 67 | 0.0562% |
| 1902 | #235 | 60 | 0.0489% |
| 1901 | #211 | 65 | 0.0611% |
| 1900 | #210 | 86 | 0.0572% |
| 1899 | #200 | 66 | 0.0621% |
| 1898 | #219 | 64 | 0.0522% |
| 1897 | #224 | 58 | 0.0514% |
| 1896 | #217 | 69 | 0.0577% |
| 1895 | #213 | 65 | 0.0554% |
| 1894 | #211 | 63 | 0.0544% |
| 1893 | #212 | 64 | 0.0570% |
| 1892 | #226 | 60 | 0.0492% |
| 1891 | #227 | 50 | 0.0494% |
| 1890 | #217 | 59 | 0.0531% |
| 1889 | #206 | 62 | 0.0561% |
| 1888 | #262 | 45 | 0.0372% |
| 1887 | #241 | 44 | 0.0434% |
| 1886 | #228 | 55 | 0.0496% |
| 1885 | #213 | 56 | 0.0519% |
| 1884 | #269 | 40 | 0.0350% |
| 1883 | #216 | 50 | 0.0478% |
| 1882 | #193 | 66 | 0.0581% |
| 1881 | #270 | 34 | 0.0338% |
| 1880 | #241 | 47 | 0.0425% |
Name popularity over more than a century, based on Social Security Administration data. Gaps in the chart indicate years when the name does not appear in the published records.